On the night of UT 030516, several Landolt standard fields were observed with the WTTM, in the B,V,R,I passbands. The 85/15 beam splitter was in use. The standard star observations were processed in the usual way, and photometric solutions were obtained for this night, solving for atmospheric extincion, as well as color terms. Let bp, vp, rp and ip be the raw magnitudes in the B,V,R, and I passbands respectively. These are of the form xp = -2.5*alog10(count rate from a star in Datanumbers (DN)) + 30.00 in passband X. then we can write: True mag X = xp + c0 + c1*airmass + c2*colorprime , where colorprime are raw colors, like vp-ip, vp-rp, etc. The solution for the night of UT030516 are then the coeffs c0, c1 and c2, which were determoned for all filters and al possible color combinations. They full solution is given immediately below: UT 030516 WTTM 85/15 dichroic ________________________________ MAG = magprime + c0 + c1*airmass + c2*colorprime Passband colorprime c0 c1 c2 rms_res err_mean V bp-vp -4.548 -0.178 -0.148 0.012 0.003 V vp-rp -4.593 -0.170 -0.176 0.021 0.005 V vp-ip -4.603 -0.193 -0.089 0.020 0.005 B bp-vp -4.434 -0.386 0.208 0.019 0.005 B bp-rp -4.418 -0.379 0.109 0.022 0.006 B bp-ip -4.387 -0.371 0.076 0.021 0.005 R bp-rp -4.889 -0.016 -0.053 0.017 0.005 R vp-rp -4.902 -0.016 -0.115 0.017 0.005 R rp-ip -4.920 -0.043 -0.117 0.018 0.005 I vp-ip -5.338 -0.107 -0.019 0.011 0.003 I bp-ip -5.334 -0.106 -0.012 0.011 0.003 I rp-ip -5.362 -0.097 -0.041 0.011 0.003 Rms residuals are 0.02 mag or less, which is typical of a clear (but not pristine photometric) night. The extinction coefficients are also typical of a clear night, but on pristine nights they are up to 30% smaller. For a star of zero intrinsic color and B=V=R=I=20.0, we can surmise the count rate in photons per second from the above, given that the `gain' was set to 1.33 electrons per DN. These rates are derived to be: Passband Count rate (photons/s) B 221 V 205 R 150 I 97 On the night of UT030602, a similar calibration was done with MIMO, with a `gain' setting of 1.4 electrons per DN. This night was only 21 nights after the WTTM data discussed above -- and the telescope mirrors and optics can be assumed to be in an equivalent state for reflectance and scattering. Thus, a comparison of count rates between the MIMO results of UT030602 with WTTM results from UT030516 is meaningful comparison of throughput. The count rates derived from MIMO observations on UT030602 (for a star with B=V=R=I=20.0 mag) are: Passband Count rate (photons/s) B 284 V 295 R 321 I 170 Thus the comparative throughput in WTTM (with the 85/15 beamsplitter) vs MIMO are: 0.78 in B, 0.69 in V, 0.47 in R, and 0.57 in I These differences INCLUDE the effect of the extra reflections to get the light into WTTM, as well as the refelections within the WTTM. They also reflect any passband and filter throughput differences.