- Identifying the high-cost parts of the project
- Identifying areas where there is significant cost uncertainty and/or cost risk
- Identifying factors that will drive the costs (for example, understanding the relationship between the timing of the project and the overall cost)
- Targeting specific areas where cost-reduction initiatives have the greatest chance of significantly reducing the overall project cost
- Understanding the costs of options, such as individual instruments, so that intelligent trades can be made between performance and cost
- Facilitating comparisons between different proposed designs (by highlighting which costs would be the same and which would differ between two proposed designs, for example)
In developing the cost estimate, NIO has worked in collaboration with industry, other astronomy organizations, and other ELT conceptual design groups.
4.10.1 Telescope Capital Cost
Table 1 summarizes the capital cost of the GSMT point design, itemized by major subsystem, in year-2002 U.S. dollars.
| Component or Subsystem |
Cost Estimate |
Percentage of
|
| Primary Mirror System |
95,126,000 |
17.1% |
| Adaptive Secondary Mirror System |
15,360,000 |
2.8% |
| Other Optics |
5,299,000 |
1.0% |
| Telescope Structure |
34,654,000 |
6.2% |
| Site |
5,000,000 |
0.9% |
| Enclosure |
50,000,000 |
9.0% |
| Support Facility and Equipment on Site |
3,419,000 |
0.6% |
| Base Facility |
4,000,000 |
0.7% |
| Overall Control System |
15,000,000 |
2.7% |
| Co-alignment, co-phasing system |
10,000,000 |
1.8% |
| Adaptive Optics |
64,858,000 |
11.7% |
| Program Office & Engineering Cost |
124,436,000 |
22.4% |
| Subtotal |
427,152,000 |
|
| Contingency on above @ 30% |
128,146,000 |
23.1% |
| Telescope - Capital Cost |
555,298,000 |

