Previous Article Next Article Table of Contents
New Observing Modes for the Next Century (1Sep95) (from USGP, NOAO Newsletter No. 43, September 1995) In early July, the USGP, along with the Gemini Project, the Joint Astronomy Centre, ESO, and the University of Hawaii at Hilo, sponsored a workshop on alternative modes of observing. About 85 participants, from a total of nine countries, attended the workshop, which was held at the University of Hawaii at Hilo. The motivation for the workshop was to compare progress and future plans among the many observatories that are trying to improve the quantity and quality of their scientific output by innovative operational approaches. The worskshop comprised six sessions: Key issues; Needs and desires of future large telescopes; Scheduling strategies; Remote/service/queue: experience; Tools for planning, scheduling, and observing; and Data reduction and archiving. Each session included an open discussion on the issues raised during the invited and contributed talks. A number of posters were on display throughout the meeting. The proceedings will be issued as a volume in the conference series of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Although almost all of the next generation of telescopes will require some kind of flexible scheduling in order to make most effective use of the varying atmospheric conditions, the presentations indicated that there is a substantial gap between what has been done and what is planned. Software systems such as Spike for HST and ATIS or APA for photometric monitoring telescopes have demonstrated the capability to address certain sorts of scheduling and planning problems. Whether they can be adapted/expanded for the somewhat different constraints of large ground-based telescopes is not yet clear. Associated with the difficulty of responding to the conditions is the difficulty of measuring (and hopefully, predicting) them. In addition to the general problem of implementing a scheduling strategy, substantial parts of the discussion centered on factors affecting the reliability of service observing and how one confidently identifies potentially successful proposals. Todd Boroson
Previous Article Next Article Table of Contents