Previous Article Next Article Table of Contents


The NOAO Instrumentation Program (1Mar95) (from Director's Office, NOAO Newsletter No. 41, 1 March 1995) The New Order As you have read in previous Newsletters, NOAO is reorganizing the way in which we produce major instrumentation for the nighttime programs. This switch was necessitated by several factors. The downward pressure on the budget in the last several years has reduced the size of the instrumentation group in Tucson to about 2/3 of its previous staffing. The same pressure on CTIO has sharply limited the technical resources available for instrument development, as opposed to the upgrade and maintenance of the telescopes. At the same time, the advent of large array detectors for both the optical and infrared has led to the desire for instruments that are larger, more capable, and more complex than in earlier years. The prospect of producing instruments, detector arrays and controllers for the Gemini telescopes requires a disciplined management of schedules and budgets. To respond to these changing conditions, we have made the organizational change of creating a single Instrumentation Program Group within the Tucson Engineering and Technical Services. It contains the personnel of the former O/UV and IR instrument groups, the various detector and other R&D programs, and the optical designers. The IPG manager is Neil Gaughan, who came to us with many years of experience as a manager of technical programs in industry, with particular expertise in electronic engineering and systems planning. Neil reports to Larry Daggert, the ETS Manager. There are several advantages of a single technical group. We anticipate decrease in the time required to complete an instrument, after it has passed its preliminary design review. By using the pool of designers and instrument makers in a priority-driven queue schedule, we can accelerate the production of the highest priority projects. By engaging a team of optical, electrical, mechanical, and software design engineers for a full project definition, each new instrument will have a clear scope and schedule when it goes into detailed design and production. Both CTIO and KPNO retain access to their own resources for upgrades to existing instruments and the quick completion of small projects. The scientific management of projects will proceed much as before. Each new instrument will have a Project Scientist, who will work with the Project Engineer to assure the success of the project and to guide the initial definition of scientific and technical performance requirements. The O/UV and IR scientific groups will remain active, with Taft Armandroff as O/UV Program Scientist and Ian Gatley as IR program scientist. These groups work to coordinate the staff and community input for generating new projects and to address areas of common technical interest in ongoing projects. The recommendations for the allocation of resources and setting of priorities are made by NOAO's internal IPAC, the Instrument Projects Advisory Committee. That committee currently consists of Taft Armandroff, Jack Baldwin, Todd Boroson, Dave De Young, Jay Elias, Ian Gatley, and Richard Green (chair). They receive proposals for new projects on an annual basis, recommend scientific priorities, and provide regular oversight for the Instrument Program Group. They also advise the Directors on the impacts on schedule and budget created by changes in scientific scope or changes in relative priority. It is the goal of IPAC and the new IPG to increase the level of scientific and technical teamwork in order to maintain the flow of facility instrumentation to both the NOAO and Gemini telescopes while managing increasing schedule and budgetary pressures. Your input to the planning process by identifying the scientific programs you would like to be able to carry out is invaluable to us. Please feel encouraged to contact your favorite member of IPAC to make your views known. Current Status of Major Projects The conversion of Hydra and the Bench Spectrograph for use at the WIYN telescope neared completion with the work done in the Fall Quarter of FY 95. The grating cells were completed, the gratings installed and aligned, and the cells were integrated into the spectrograph. The SITe 2048 square CCD, T2KC, was more fully integrated in its ARCON operation with the WIYN control environment. A safety lockout mechanism for the Hydra hinge was designed and nearly completed. (See the article in the KPNO section of this issue for further details.) The second highest priority is the completion of Phoenix, the high-resolution near-IR spectrograph. The detailed mechanical design was 98% completed in the First Quarter, and the instrument makers were beginning work to fabricate the parts. Thermal cycling tests of the big grating were yielding satisfactory results. The spectrograph is on track for completion and telescope testing in early 1996. Progress was made on the CCD Mosaic Imager. The controller architecture was reviewed, and chosen to be a system based on the replication of four ARCONs. The dewar window frame and shutter fabrication were completed, and design work was in progress on the filter wheel, dewar and chip-mount assemblies. A new package was designed for mounting the 2K X 4K CCDs. Although the detail designs will be nearly finished for this project in the coming months, fabrication will not begin in earnest until the team of instrument makers is nearing the end with the Phoenix parts. The ALADDIN development program made significant progress with the delivery of a second hybrid array. That array had four functional quadrants and over 900K good pixels. There are still hybridization and other process issues to be resolved, but the progress in this program is very encouraging. Design work is also underway for a new generation controller, compatible with WILDFIRE and capable of reading out the full-format 1024 square array. The interface to the data storage medium and image analysis system is a critical item. Project definition, as well as conceptual and preliminary design, have been started for GRASP, a spectrograph based on the four-color heritage of SQIID. The current plan calls for four near-IR bands to be recorded simultaneously in direct imaging or a choice of spectroscopic modes. The goal is to populate each arm with a 1024 square InSb array, with a common control system. The Preliminary Design Review is scheduled for mid-March. Concept studies are underway for two new instruments. One is a clone of the Hydra fiber positioner for use at the R-C focus of the CTIO 4-meter telescope. Much of the design and some of the actual parts from Hydra at the Mayall can be used for this implementation. At the same time, the project would utilize a new generation of motor controllers that will be valuable for KPNO as well, since the current system in use with WIYN/Hydra is no longer produced. The second study is for a long-slit near-IR spectrograph for CTIO and Gemini South. It will be based on a design proposed to the Gemini Project for use on the Gemini North telescope. Features could include a slit viewer and cross-dispersion to cover the entire atmospheric window at a resolution of about 8000. The design is based on the 1024 square ALADDIN InSb array. These are the major projects occupying the Instrument Projects Group this year. Your comments and reactions to the match of the instrumentation program to your scientific needs are welcome any time. Richard Green
Previous Article Next Article Table of Contents