Previous Article Next Article Table of Contents
Drift Scanning at the 4-m (1Mar94) (from KPNO, NOAO Newsletter No. 37, 1 March 1994) In 1986 we implemented a scan-table for the Prime Focus CCD camera that allowed much "flatter" (more uniform) images to be obtained. In this mode a scanning table on which the CCD is mounted is stepped by a few rows while the charge is shifted simultaneously by the same number of rows; the procedure is continued until the requested number of rows and total integration time have been achieved. Since a given point in the resulting image has actually been observed with a number of different pixels of the detector, the non- uniformities in the chip have been effectively averaged in producing the final image. The flat-fielding job is therefore easier, as you are starting with intrinsically much flatter data. We have recently upgraded the system to work with our large Tektronix 2048 x 2048 devices and to make it considerably easier for users to both obtain and reduce their data. In addition to the new scan-table itself, the data acquisition software ICE has been modified to do basically it all for you: all the user needs to specify is the number of rows he or she wishes to scan in addition to the integration time. The integration time is divided by the number of rows one wishes to average over, and the table is stepped (and the charge clocked) that often - although care must be taken not to exceed the rate of a few Hertz! In typical use, one might short-scan in order to reduce the effects of the night-sky fringing in the I-band, as Marc Postman (STScI) has done in the accompanying pair of images. After a little experimenting he choose to scan 60 rows to smooth over the higher- frequency (and higher amplitude) fringes apparent in the unscanned image. The low-frequency stuff still needs to be removed by normal de-fringing techniques, but the fact that he is starting with something much flatter to begin with makes this job far easier. [Figures not included] In addition to updating the instrument hardware and software, we have also prevailed upon Frank Valdes of the IRAF group to modify the CCD reduction code to check for and process scanned images. If one attempts to reduce a scanned image with an unscanned flat-field, the software will now do the numerical smoothing of the flat-field image to match what would have been obtained if the flat-field had been scanned in the first place. (Thus the user need only obtain unscanned flats.) In the words of one user, "Why would anyone not scan?" Phil Massey
Previous Article Next Article Table of Contents