Previous Article Next Article Table of Contents
Report of the CTIO Users Committee (1Mar94) (from CTIO, NOAO Newsletter No. 37, 1 March 1994) The CTIO Users' Committee held its annual meeting in Tucson on 8 and 9 December 1993, and after discussions with CTIO Director Malcolm Smith and Interim Director Mark Phillips, submitted the following report: Introduction US astronomy is facing a fundamentally changing situation. A new generation of large telescopes is coming on line during a time at which level funding is expected and in which both the grants program and NOAO are already experiencing budget difficulties. The subsequent pressure on NSF astronomy funding and for CTIO in particular is a cause for serious concern. As a result, CTIO is proposing innovative plans for surviving a flat funding situation and preserving critical access for US astronomers to the Southern hemisphere. A major goal for CTIO is to have its existing telescopes and instrumentation on Tololo functioning at an extremely high degree of reliability and simplicity. Thus when commissioning occurs of the Gemini telescope at Cerro Pachon (which is expected to heavily affect CTIO's available manpower), the existing Tololo operation can be maintained with limited resources. The Committee strongly endorses these goals, and emphasizes the need to keep the smaller telescopes operating, as they have traditionally been a strong complement to the larger telescopes. Moreover, the Committee wishes to express strong support for the energetic approach and innovative ideas of the new CTIO Director, Malcolm Smith. Due to the above issues, and to the arrival of the new Director, the Committee felt obliged to take a longer-term outlook than usual. As a consequence, issues concerning the long-term strategy for CTIO occupied much of the discussion and this is reflected in the report that follows. This discussion is ongoing and will continue to evolve as the budget picture develops. Thus the Committee urges CTIO users to contact individual Committee members with their thoughts about future strategies for CTIO, so that it can effectively advance the opinions of the user community. Funding Outlook and Long-Range Planning At a joint session of the KPNO and CTIO Users' Committees on 8 December, Hugh van Horn, the new Director of the Division of Astronomical Sciences at the NSF, outlined the funding difficulties facing US astronomy. The advent of a number of new large telescopes for the US community in addition to new technological developments, such as adaptive optics/ interferometry and large format detector arrays, will create a need for additional funds to operate these facilities. However, the expectation at present is for flat funding levels in the foreseeable future. Given that the NSF astronomy grants program is already severely constrained, as is the NOAO budget (which has experienced a decline of ~30% in real dollars over the past decade), a careful review is being undertaken of the future of optical/IR astronomy in the US. A major component of this review will be to examine the future mission of NOAO. Clearly, difficult decisions will have to be made regarding the balance of funding between the individual grants program and that for the national centers. The Director emphasized the importance of obtaining input from the entire astronomical community in conducting this review and proposed that the KPNO and CTIO Users' Committees serve as a vehicle for canvassing the user community. Consequently, our Committee will carry out a survey similar to the one already conducted by the KPNO Users' Committee. In addition, individual users are urged to contact members of the Committee with their thoughts on long-term issues for CTIO (e-mail addresses of all Committee members follow at the end of this report). It is essential that the planning process for NOAO go forward with strong input from the community. Impact of Gemini on CTIO Operations In the joint session of the KPNO and CTIO Users' Committees a report was given on the status of the Gemini project. The project is well on track: all international partners are now on board, funding has been secured, and a number of major contracts for the telescope subassemblies are expected to be awarded during the next year. The main issue regarding CTIO is the impact that Gemini South will have on operations at Tololo. The role of CTIO in Gemini operations is still under discussion and remains to be clearly defined. Nevertheless, facing flat funding, the US money for Gemini operations will have to come from somewhere, and the logical expectation is that CTIO will "pay" by having some personnel switched to Gemini duties. Thus it is the expectation of the CTIO staff that the commissioning of the Gemini telescope on Cerro Pachon (which is likely to begin in 1998) will place especially heavy demands on CTIO personnel. As a result, it is essential for the existing telescopes on Tololo to be operating in the most reliable and efficient manner possible by the time that the commissioning of Gemini South is underway. The Director has proposed partnerships between CTIO and universities as a means of ensuring that the above goal will be expedited. The recent ongoing collaborations with the University of Michigan (upgrade of CCD imaging at the Curtis Schmidt), the Space Telescope Science Institute (upgrades to the spectrograph cameras on the 1.5-m and 1-m telescopes), and the Ohio State University (loan of their OSIRIS IR instrument) are possible examples of constructive partnerships between CTIO and the universities. A limited amount of observing time has been allocated to these partners in exchange for instrumentation upgrades. The Committee enthusiastically endorsed this approach. However, we have since learned that at the worst-case budget levels predicted over the next five years CTIO will not have any resources available for this sort of matching of effort on the smallest telescopes, if they are to keep the larger telescopes (down through the 1.5m) operating at an acceptable level. The Committee strongly opposes a decline in the CTIO budget to that level. Instead, we must ensure that the existing, well-run, and unique (for US astronomers) CTIO operation is not sacrificed when Gemini is commissioned. Instrumentation Joint KPNO/CTIO Instrumentation Projects During the joint KPNO and CTIO Users' Committee meeting, several ongoing and future instrumentation projects were described that are being carried out in collaborations between the KPNO and CTIO staffs. The goal of the joint instrumentation effort is to undertake major instrumentation programs that would not be possible at the individual observatories. The CTIO Users' Committee commends the cooperative spirit evident in the programs. This approach is particularly important given the expectation of a severely constrained budget in the future. At the same time we wish to emphasize the importance of the individual instrument efforts being undertaken by the ETS group in La Serena. ARCON Controllers and 4-m Imaging Performance At present most of the CTIO instrumentation effort is committed to the production of ARCON controllers and to progress on the imaging performance at the 4-m telescope. These projects appear to be proceeding expeditiously. We were pleased to see timelines on these projects, and look forward to seeing real improvements in the image quality at the 4-m next year. Implementation of New CCDs The Committee is concerned about the rate at which new CCD chips, already received by CTIO, are being implemented on the Tololo telescopes and urges CTIO to have the new chips available as soon as possible. NOAO has distinguished itself in providing top-quality CCDs on its telescopes and it is critical that this advantage be maintained at Tololo. While in general the Committee fully endorses the concept of completing one instrumentation project before starting another one, enough manpower needs to be reserved for commissioning of the new CCDs on a parallel track to the major instrumentation projects underway. IR Instrumentation Given the progress made with both the ARCON and 4-m imaging upgrade projects, the Committee is pleased that a full-scale effort is now being made in the area of IR instrumentation. The Committee endorses both the short-term and long-term plans put forward at the meeting. Specifically, the short-term plan, already well underway, is to (1) commission a NICMOS 256 x 256 HgCdTe imager by mid-1994 and (2) upgrade the IRS with a 256 x 256 InSb array using the KPNO WILDFIRE control electronics by late-1994. Completion of these projects will allow Tololo to catch up to the existing technology at other observatories. In the meanwhile, CTIO users will continue to have access to OSIRIS for the first nine months of 1994 through a joint arrangement with Ohio State University. The long-term plan involves a major joint IR instrumentation project between KPNO/CTIO/USNO and SBRC to develop 1024 x 1024 InSb arrays. This collaboration is an important example of joint cooperation in instrumentation between KPNO and CTIO and is fully endorsed by the Committee. The joint IR instrumentation is predicated on an f/15 image scale at the 4-m telescopes (so that IR instruments can be duplicated and/or shared with f/15 foci at the KPNO 4-m and Gemini telescopes), and so a new f/15 secondary for the CTIO 4-m is required. Last year the Committee recommended that funds for this secondary be provided by NOAO, rather than coming exclusively from the CTIO budget. We are very pleased to learn that NOAO will indeed fund the f/15 secondary. Smart Controllers CTIO is in immediate need of replacing many of its aging Camac controllers for spectrographs, filter wheels, etc. In so doing, it is taking the lead at NOAO in implementing a new generation of smart controllers. It clearly would be highly desirable for NOAO and Gemini to standardize on this smart controller technology as soon as possible, to allow for a compatible set of controllers at NOAO and Gemini sites in the future. The Committee commends CTIO for its efforts in the area of smart controller development and hopes that discussions (and agreement) on a standard for NOAO and Gemini will soon take place. Multi-fiber Spectroscopy The Committee recommends that CTIO explore the feasibility of duplicating the KPNO Hydra multi-fiber positioner. Given the popularity and success of both Hydra and Argus, it would be very productive for the science conducted at Tololo to have an instrument with the expanded number of fibers offered by Hydra. If feasible, such a project would be another example of the joint KPNO/CTIO collaborative instrumentation projects that are strongly endorsed above by this Committee. We emphasize, however, that given the limited manpower available, any effort of this kind should not detract from the IR instrumentation efforts. Small Telescopes As previously mentioned, an important goal is to have operation of the smaller telescopes so efficient that their impact on mountain operations will be minimal - especially during the commissioning of Gemini South. The new large telescopes coming on line will not be able to replace the small telescopes, which historically have been a vital component to the user community. With these upgrades they will continue to complement the science carried out by the large telescopes. In particular, the Committee encourages CTIO to convert the smaller telescopes to the new telescope control system, VxWorks, in order to be consistent with the 4-m, 1.5-m and Gemini. TAC Procedures The Committee is pleased by the modifications to the proposal review procedures that have been instituted since last year. However, especially now that the external referee system has been abolished, it is particularly important that automatic feedback be given by the TAC for failed proposals. The Committee feels that lack of feedback for failed proposals is an important source of user dissatisfaction. Moreover, the Committee reiterates its recommendation from last year that membership on the TAC be sufficiently broad to cover all fields. Other Procedures Both Malcolm Smith and Mark Phillips gave detailed responses to the recommendations made in the Committee's report from last year. The Committee is very pleased with the careful response of CTIO to these recommendations, and particularly acknowledges the leadership during the last year of former Director Bob Williams and Interim Director Mark Phillips. We urge that the "Response to Last Year's Users' Committee Report" remain an agenda item for future meetings. Given the present climate of uncertainty surrounding the long-term mission of NOAO, the CTIO Committee recommends that a joint executive session of both KPNO and CTIO Users' Committees be held during the 1994 meeting. Remote/Service Observing Remote observing is not yet possible because of the NASA satellite bandwidth (no T1 line is yet available). The main obstacle to service observing lies in the manpower needed to carry it out. It may be possible to establish cooperation between Universities and CTIO in a mutually beneficial program of training graduate students as service observers. Such an arrangement, if pursued, should be undertaken with an eye toward promoting the efficiency of operation that is needed to maximize productivity under tight budget constraints and for giving graduate students valuable experiences that they would not ordinarily obtain at their home institutions. Data Archiving Data archiving in the long term will become an increasingly important issue, especially in times of tighter funding. The Committee encourages CTIO to investigate potential cooperation with existing facilities which have developed expertise for maintenance of publicly accessible archives. Such a collaboration might substantially reduce the imposing manpower and financial requirements for setting up a long-term public archive of CTIO data. As a first step, however, the Committee encourages CTIO to implement the "save the bits" procedures presently in place at KPNO. For the future, the Committee believes that in principle public access to archival ground-based optical/IR data obtained at the national observatories should be similar to that established for the space-based observatories. Miscellaneous Observer Support Issues 1) It is very inconvenient to have the library so far away from the summit. CTIO is encouraged to find space for a library in the new building currently under construction on the summit. 2) There should be a public workstation or a terminal for the astronomers who are not currently observing but are at the summit. While observers are encouraged to spend only a minimum number of nights on the mountain, some observers arrive at the mountain early due to restricted travel possibilities on weekends. Moreover, graduate students and other new observers may need to arrive early to watch their telescope and instrument in operation before going on the telescope themselves. In addition, observers occasionally have a night or two between runs. A good place for this workstation would be in the new library on the second floor of the new building. 3) Under the current travel policy, thesis students are switched from full to partial support if their advisors accompany them. This policy imposes a heavy financial penalty on thesis advisors who wish to assist their students in an initial observing run. CTIO is urged to change this policy so that the thesis student still receives full travel support if accompanied by his/her advisor. 4) There is a definite need for good quality DAT drives at the summit for the increasing number of observers with DATs at their home institutions. Safety Issues The Committee applauds the efforts by CTIO to maintain high safety standards, and is very pleased with its response to a minor accident that occurred last April. However, given that an accident did occur, we feel that it would be wise to conduct an external safety inspection at CTIO. Light Pollution The Committee is concerned (and has heard from several users) about the growing number of lights visible from the summit at CTIO. The light pollution, which arises not only from La Serena/Coquimbo but from smaller nearby towns as well, will increase with the economic growth of the region. Light pollution must be addressed in order for CTIO to remain competitive, and as we know from our experiences in the US, an early and concerted effort is essential for light containment to be effective. We therefore support in the strongest terms the efforts of the CTIO Director to address this problem. CTIO Users' Committee: Jay Frogel, Ohio State University frogel@galileo.mps.ohio-state.edu, Suzanne Hawley, Michigan State University slh@pillan.pa.msu.edu, Jose Maza, Universidad de Chile jmaza@das.uchile.cl, Karen Meech, University of Hawaii meech@pavo.ifa.hawaii.edu, Marc Postman, Space Telescope Science Institute postman@stsci.edu, Jim Rose (Chair), University of North Carolina jim@wrath.physics.unc.edu, George Wallerstein, University of Washington wall@astro.phys.washington.edu
Previous Article Next Article Table of Contents