Previous Article Next Article Table of Contents
Response to the 1994 KPNO Users Committee Report (1Jun95) (from Director's Office, NOAO Newsletter No. 42, June 1995) Kitt Peak National Observatory usually derives great benefit from the wisdom and advice of its Users Committee, and 1994 was no exception. We very much appreciate the thoughtful attention the Users Committee gives to the issues confronting KPNO. The format of the 1994 meeting provided an opportunity for a real dialog between the Committee and the Observatory staff; the advice of the Users Committee has been an important part of our planning for FY 1996 and beyond. The Users Committee endorsed the four central concepts of the long term vision for Kitt Peak developed through the NOAO 2000 process: 1) the emphasis on scientific capabilities, 2) the concept of complementing rather than competing with the Gemini 8-m telescopes, 3) the unification of the NOAO Instrumentation Program, and 4) our initiatives to build new, modern telescopes at Kitt Peak. And the Committee stressed that continued access to telescopes and state-of-the-art instruments remains the single most important job of KPNO. These concepts will continue to guide our planning. The Users Committee also noted its concerns about aspects of the NOAO 2000 report. They felt our planning placed too much emphasis on KPNO as a support facility for Gemini, and that we had not fully addressed how important scientific capabilities would be provided under various options for new facilities on Kitt Peak. The Committee offered specific advice to guide our long term planning, and their recommendations are being folded into our plans. Specifically, the Committee recommended that we maintain significant capability for wide field, optical imaging, that we provide the capability for monitoring programs and calibration studies requiring substantial telescope time, and that we consider carefully the impact of changes in operations on graduate student training. The Committee recommended explicitly that a new 2-m class telescope be included in the planning to address these concerns. We have done so, and a progress report is included elsewhere in this Newsletter. The Users Committee agreed with the decision to close the 1.3-m telescope this spring, given the reality of the budget and the beginning of operations of the WIYN telescope. They urged that we make the closing of the telescope as painless as possible for users. We attempted to do that by moving several highly ranked programs to the 2.1-m telescope, and by scheduling four programs using SQIID or the photoelectric photometer to completion on the 1.3-m telescope before it closed. The Committee stressed that they do not wish to see additional telescopes closed before replacement facilities become available. The Committee approved the proposed additional instrument retirements and urged us to make those changes also as painless as possible to the community by giving advance notice and by making an effort to see that ongoing programs can be completed. As noted in the March 1995 NOAO Newsletter, the KPNO staff, as well as the staff throughout Tucson, was reduced by nearly 10%. The changes required because of these staff reductions include: o The 1.3-m telescope has been closed. o KPNO Mountain Manager Bruce Bohannan has assumed responsibility for supervision of the Observing Technicians. o The Instrument Assistants have assumed day-to-day responsibility for monitoring instrument performance and coordinating response to any problems that arise. o Hal Halbedel has assumed overall responsibility for the Kitt Peak Safety Program. o Start-up and technical assistance at small telescopes will be reduced. o The number of instrument changes will be reduced through instrument retirements and further block scheduling. o Dining room services have been reduced. Cuts in other NOAO/Tucson divisions led to a reduction in shuttle service to and from the mountain and a reduction in programmer support for Kitt Peak. The Users Committee told us that "KPNO must give top priority to continuing to operate the remaining small telescopes." If followed literally, this advise would be a substantial shift from our existing priorities of WIYN and the 4-m telescopes. Fortunately, the Users Committee also recommended that we make an effort to change the style of operation of the small telescopes to lower the cost of operating them in order to keep them open until replacements can be built. They recommended that the 2.1-m telescope be run by observers rather than an operator, that less start-up assistance be provided on the smaller telescopes, and that creature comforts be cut before more telescopes are closed. We have implemented their recommendations starting with the fall semester 1995. The Users Committee also urged us to continue to experiment with new programs like Save-the-Bits, the queue scheduling experiments, the WIYN queue program, and Key Projects in order to enhance scientific services and opportunities for the community. The WIYN telescope and WIYN queue program are about to go into operation, and we hope that the new service observing program on the small telescopes will also provide new opportunities for users. In response to the Users Committee suggestions concerning graduate student training and observing time for theses, we have advertised (in the last issue of the Newsletter) a program for graduate students to gain observing experience on Kitt Peak. We will be pursuing this program more vigorously for the fall semester. We are exploring the possibility of allocating longer observing blocks to graduate students on the small telescopes so that students can complete theses in a timely way. The Users Committee also made two recommendations concerning instrument improvements on Kitt Peak: that the new camera for the GoldCam CCD spectrograph should receive high priority and that we move with all haste to procure a blue grating for the bench spectrograph on the WIYN telescope. We now expect that the camera for Goldcam should be available for testing on the telescope by the beginning of 1996. The blue grating will be purchased as soon as its performance characteristics are available from Milton Roy. The Committee also urged the completion of the Mosaic Imager, the Phoenix high resolution IR spectrometer, and the design and construction of the GRASP IR four-color spectrometer/imager to replace SQIID and COB. Those projects are receiving high priority and should be completed on schedule. The Committee also recommended that IRIM not be decommissioned for use at the Starfire Optical Range 3.5-m telescope, and we are seeking alternate means to support that collaboration. IRIM will remain at Kitt Peak until GRASP is commissioned. Following the suggestions of the Users Committee, we will also seek further collaborations with other groups in the community for new instruments. The replacement of the 4-m R-C spectrograph may be a good opportunity for such collaboration, as would adaptive optics. Finally, the Users Committee applauded the effort of the KPNO staff to take on new roles---KPNO remains a truly world class facility through the dedicated effort of the staff. The Committee was pleased with the evaluation of the future of KPNO prepared by the staff which resulted in the NOAO 2000 planning document. They urged us now to reach out to the community and to listen to the needs of our constituents. And they urged you, the users of Kitt Peak National Observatory, to redouble efforts to speak out as advocates for your facilities and as a source of suggestions and improvements to our program. Caty Pilachowski
Previous Article Next Article Table of Contents