Next: 3.2 Summary
Previous: 3 Estimating Exposure Times
In order to provide an easy way of estimating exposure times, we provide
in Fig. 8 the actual measured count rates (per Å, not
per pixel) normalized to an
mag star.
We show both the case where the slit is essentially wide-open
(8
) and when the slit has a nominal size in modest seeing conditions.
Although various
gratings and grisms are shown, the basis for comparing different gratings
should really be the efficiency plots in the previous section.
But Fig. 8
should
provide a good guide to what to expect at the telescope in terms of count
rates near the grating blaze in medium and excellent seeing.
Thus, we might expect to obtain about 800 e/sec/Å at
th mag
with the 4-m RCSpec
under moderate seeing conditions. If the seeing were
spectacular, it might be as much as 1000 or 1300, but let's not get
too optimistic at proposal writing time---we're after a realistic number.
Thus at 18th magnitude, we would expect to obtain
e/sec/Å. To obtain a SNR of 50 per 3Å resolution element would
require 2500 e per 3Å, or 2500/1.5
1700s, or about half an hour.
Figure 8:
The measured count rates per Å for the RC Spectrograph (4-m), the CryoCam
(4-m),
and GoldCam (2.1-m), normalized to a 10th magnitude star observed near zenith.
If you are working near the sky limit, you will have to contend not only with photon-noise from your object, but photon-noise from the sky. We assume that you can determine the sky level to infinite precision (a good enough assumption if your object is small compared to the slit length [not always true with multislits], and if you have done a good job in matching the slit-function as described in Sec. 4.1), but there will still be root-Nish fluctuations in the sky over your spectrum.
Let us imagine that we wish to observe a V=21 mag object at 5000Å
with the RC Spectrograph on a good, moonless night, with 1.4
seeing. We are using a 2
slit.
Figure 9: The spectrum of the
moonless Kitt Peak sky.
In the ``optical" region (4000-6500) the continuum
rises from 23 mag/arcsec2 to 21.5, with the major artifical
source the NaD lines from street-lights (see
Massey, Gronwall & Pilachowski
1990 PASP, 102, 1046). Further in the red,
the sky spectrum is dominated by OH emission lines.
We show the spectrum of the Kitt Peak dark sky in Fig. 9.
At 5000Å the sky is about 22.8 mag/arcsec
. The number
of square arcseconds in this example is 4 arcsec
, if we assume that
we will extract the object spectrum using a 3 pixel extraction
aperture (3 pixels = 2
). Thus on top of our V=21 object we
have a
mag source: the sky. We
expect to obtain
e/sec/Å from
the sky, and, unfortunately, only
e/sec/Å from the object. Note that we needed to use the ``full
throughput" number for the sky, while we must accept the ``modest
seeing" number for our object! To reach a SNR of 50 per 3Å resolution
element, we have as ``signal"
from our object, but
our noise sources are two-fold: the photon-noise from our object
(
) plus the photon-noise from the sky:
(
), where t is the integration time in seconds.
We must add the two noise sources in quadature, and hence

or 20800s (5.8 hrs), a little more than double the 2.6 hrs had there been no sky contribution.
With some moonlight, the sky will be brighter in the blue; the following
table gives a rough guide.
We have ignored a third source of noise in the above discussion, namely
read-noise. The read-noise component will be
Sky Brightness (mag/arcsec²) lunar age (days)
U
B
V
R
I
3600Å
4300Å
5500Å
6500Å
8200Å 0
22.0
22.7
21.8
20.9
19.9 3
21.5
22.4
21.7
20.8
19.9 7
19.9
21.6
21.4
20.6
19.7 10
18.5
20.7
20.7
20.3
19.5 14
17.0
19.5
20.0
19.9
19.2
, where
p is the number of pixels in a spectral resolution element and integrated
over the spatial profile, and R is the read-noise. In the example
above we would expect p to be roughly 2.5 X 3 = 7 pixels. With
T2KB, the read-noise R=3 e. The noise contribution from photon-noise
of the object is
; the contribution from the
photon-noise is
, while the read-noise contribution will be
, and thus we were justified in ignoring it, even
though in practice we'd probably break the 5.8 hr exposure down into 6
one-hour integrations, increasing the read-noise by
. But in the
case of low signal-to-noise, the read-noise may be important, particularly
with the 15 e read-noise of CryoCam.
Next: 3.2 Summary
Previous: 3 Estimating Exposure Times