Next: Filters and the Shutter
Previous: The SlitDeckers, and Acquisition TVs
Figure 4 is a conservative estimate of the trend of resolution or
FWHM (full-width at half-maximum) versus slit width for the
instrument.
The spatial scale is
0.78 arcsecs/pixel.
It should be pointed out that there is a general trend of slightly
poorer focus as one goes from the center of the field to the edge.
The procedure for slit width selection has been to try to match the projected
slit width to
the resolution of the detector with some consideration being given to the slit
light losses.
For spectrographs with significant collimator-to-camera angle (
15°),
such as the Gold spectrograph, the full
expression for projected slit width should be used.

Here w is the projected slit width, W the actual (physical) slit width, and r is the "grating anamorphic magnification". The factor r is a function of the grating tilt and collimator-camera angle, i.e.

where
is the collimator-camera angle (55°) and t is
the grating tilt.
For the Wynne camera design, the camera-to-collimator focal ratio is
0.24 .
At large grating inclinations the anamorphic
demagnification factor becomes significant. In these cases the slit can be
opened wider without degrading the resolution.
See F. Schweizer's article PASP
91
, No. 539, 149, 1979 for more information.
Another factor, of lesser importance,
for consideration at high grating inclinations is the
grating fill
factor, or that fraction of the light leaving the collimator that
strikes the grating. As the grating tilt increases, a point is reached
where the grating becomes overfilled and light is lost above and below
the grating. This factor is also shown in Figure 5. Even
at tilts as high as 5.00, the loss is only
9%.